Racial Justice

While the law provides equal opportunity in theory, it is too often denied in fact.

Racial Justice

What you need to know

Pittsburgh's Department of Justice Decree (1996-1997)

ACLU-PA, NAACP, and Parents Against Violence filed a lawsuit against the City of Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police for police misconduct.

Stop-and-frisk challenges (2010)

ACLU-PA and the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg filled a federal class action on November 4, 2010, on behalf of eight African American and Latino men who were stopped by Philadelphia police officers solely on the basis of their race and ethnicity.

Voter ID Law (2011-2012)

ACLU-PA joins and leads opposition to a restrictive Voter ID law in legislation and in court. The law was ruled unconstitutional.

Though generations of civil rights activism have led to important gains in legal, political, social, employment, educational and other spheres, the forced removal of indigenous peoples and the enslavement of those of African descent marked the beginnings of a system of racial injustice from which our nation has yet to break free.

While the law provides equal opportunity in theory, it is too often denied in fact. The ACLU aims to preserve and extend constitutionally guaranteed rights to people who have historically been denied their rights on the basis of race or ethnicity.

The Latest

News & Commentary
photo of Lady Liberty

Injustice happens in a moment. Accountability takes time.

In December of 2020, a McKeesport police officer was shot while in pursuit of a suspect. The suspect was an individual who was well-known to McKeesport police. As they called in reinforcements from other police departments across the county, McKeesport police began an aggressive manhunt that intentionally and unconstitutionally targeted and terrorized Black residents.
Press Release
Placeholder image

McKeesport Residents Win Settlement in ACLU-PA Lawsuit Over Police Misconduct

The city of McKeesport and its police department have agreed to settle a lawsuit over the violation of numerous Black residents’ Fourth Amendment rights and the Pennsylvania Constitution during a police search for a shooting suspect.
Press Release
Placeholder image

Montgomery County Reforms Probation and Parole System Following ACLU Lawsuit

The decision to end the lawsuit comes as Montgomery County has made meaningful progress in reforming its probation and parole revocation system.
Resource
Placeholder image

All-Member Webinar: The Truth About Executive Orders and Lawful DEI in Pennsylvania Schools

Are you concerned about recent federal actions and what they mean for DEI in PA schools? We respond to some of the many questions and concerns we’ve heard from our schools and parents about recent federal executive actions.
Court Case
Jan 20, 2026

El et al. v. 38th Judicial District et al.

In October 2021, the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Pennsylvania filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of six plaintiffs, challenging the unconstitutional incarceration of people facing probation and parole revocation proceedings in Montgomery County. The lawsuit alleged that the county continued to violate both the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution by incarcerating nearly every person accused of violating the conditions of their supervision for months until their revocation hearing and asked that Montgomery County hold prompt revocation hearings to assess probable cause and whether detention is necessary and appropriate, and that the court provide whatever relief it deems necessary to the class of plaintiffs named in the challenge. In January 2026, the ACLU and ACLU-PA dismissed the lawsuit in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania against Montgomery County after the county implemented a number of reforms to its probation and parole system. Since the lawsuit was announced, Montgomery County has created a Detention Hearing Officer ("DHO") program that has addressed many of the violations that prompted the lawsuit. Although Montgomery County’s policies on criminal legal reform are by no means perfect, a review of county data since the implementation of the DHO program shows that Montgomery County has provided detention hearings within five business days for 95% of cases with a scheduled detention hearing — a significant improvement from where the county was before.
Court Case
Apr 10, 2019

McKeesport Black Student Union v. Holtzman

Court Case
Dec 21, 2017

United States v. Pedro Ramon Payano

Court Case
Aug 13, 2012

Foster, et al. v. City of Pittsburgh