All Cases


4 Court Cases
Court Case
Feb 11, 2026
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Doe v. DHS

The “MontCo Community Watch” Facebook and Instagram accounts aim to spread awareness of immigration enforcement activity in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, and to share alerts, documentation, and resources to help inform residents within Montgomery County - regardless of their immigration status-of their rights, due process, and the human dignity all their neighbors inherently hold. Additionally, the accounts inform the local community where ICE agents are publicly conducting immigration enforcement activities within Montgomery County. On September 11, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued two administrative Summonses to Meta Platforms, Inc., citing a federal statute, 19 U.S.C. § 1509, focused on customs investigations relating to merchandise. In the Summonses, DHS demanded constitutionally protected information far outside the scope of the statutory authority—including the identity of the Meta users associated with the MontCo Community Watch social media accounts and IP addresses from which each account had been accessed. The Summonses included no substantiating allegations and did not mention any specific crime or potential customs violation that might trigger an inquiry under the cited statute. In October, we filed an urgent motion to quash the administrative subpoenas on behalf of our client "J. Doe," the account manager, arguing that the subpoena was unlawful on both constitutional grounds, as it violated Doe’s First Amendment rights, and statutory grounds. Our motion sought to protect the identities of those associated with MontCo Community Watch from being exposed to a government agency targeting the community watch group for simply exercising their rights to free speech and association. DHS agreed to withdraw the subpoenas following our legal challenges. In February, we filed a motion for the federal government to cover legal fees for their baseless attempts to access our clients' data. This action comes on the heels of a troubling pattern of similar abusive administrative subpoenas issued by DHS that seek to chill constitutionally protected speech. We're seeking to hold DHS accountable and curb the use of these unlawful subpoenas. See our related case here.
Court Case
Feb 5, 2026
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

FOIA Request for Records Related to Parady La

Mr. Parady La, a 46-year-old Cambodian American father and longtime Philadelphia-area resident, died on January 9, 2026, days after being detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at FDC Philadelphia. ICE has stated that La was undergoing treatment for drug withdrawal when he was found unresponsive in his cell. His family says significant questions remain unanswered regarding his medical care, treatment, and the circumstances leading to his death. On February 5, 2026, the ACLU of Pennsylvania filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on behalf of Mr. La's family, seeking the production of records from ICE and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) related to the detention and death of Mr. La while he was in ICE custody. As part of the request, the ACLU-PA asks for the release of "any and all" records, including: Mr. La's detention file, medical care records, autopsy report, video footage and photos, calls, emails, witness statements, and relevant policies and procedures to help uncover the truth about Mr. La’s treatment in ICE custody.
Court Case
Jan 29, 2026
Placeholder image
  • TLGBQIA+ Equality

Penn State Health v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania filed a petition to intervene in a lawsuit challenging the Pennsylvania Human Relation Commission’s (PHRC) definition of sex discrimination as it applies to gender diverse Pennsylvanians. The litigation stems from a patient of Penn Health being denied gender-affirming care. EJ Stiles was scheduled for a gender-affirming surgery at Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center that had been months in the works. Mr. Stiles had been referred to a surgeon who had operating privileges at Penn State Health St. Joseph and had followed all the necessary steps ahead of the surgery. Just 13 hours before the scheduled surgery, the hospital informed Stiles that the surgery was cancelled because it was “against the Catholic Diocese. While Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center at one point was a private hospital (previously St. Joseph Medical Center), it is now a public institution under the auspices of Penn State Health. Thus, the hospital’s invocation of the Catholic Diocese was a violation of the First Amendment. In January 2025, the ACLU of Pennsylvania filed a complaint with the PHRC on behalf of Stiles. In response, Penn State Health St. Joseph sued the PHRC in Commonwealth Court seeking to establish a religious exemption to the anti-discrimination protections of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and invalidate PHRC regulations that define sex discrimination to include discrimination on the basis of gender identity or gender expression. Even after PHRC dismissed the Stiles’ complaint, Penn State Health moved ahead with its lawsuit against the PHRC, seeking to invalidate PHRC’s regulations regarding sex discrimination.
Court Case
Nov 7, 2022
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Pennsylvania State Conference of the NAACP et al. v. Schmidt et al

The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Pennsylvania have filed a federal lawsuit to ensure that Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that are missing a handwritten date on the return envelope or dated incorrectly are counted.