Commonwealth v. Petrick

  • Filed: Dec 10, 2018
  • Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • Latest Update: Dec 10, 2018
Placeholder image

Summary


The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that an individual may not rely on a prior bankruptcy decision to eliminate the obligation to pay restitution that is later imposed by a criminal court at sentencing. The Court reasoned that restitution is rehabilitative in nature, and thus federal law does not permit its discharge.

Attorney(s):
Andrew Christy, ACLU of Pennsylvania, Ethan D. Fogel, G. Eric Brunstad, Jr., Dechert LLP; Henry D. Sommer, National Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Center

Documents


Learn More About the Issues in This Case