Krasner, et al. v. Henry

  • Filed: 03/01/2024
  • Status: Filed
  • Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
  • Latest Update: Mar 04, 2024
Placeholder image

The ACLU of Pennsylvania has filed an amicus brief on behalf of a number of criminal legal reform and voting rights advocacy organizations in a lawsuit brought by Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner that challenges Act 40. Act 40 is a state law that allows the Pennsylvania Attorney General to appoint a special prosecutor for any crime that occurs on Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA).

If enforced, Act 40 would disenfranchise the Philadelphia voters who overwhelmingly elected and re-elected DA Krasner in landslide elections in 2017 and 2021. Act 40 would usurp the authority that those voters entrusted in DA Krasner.

The amicus brief alleges a violation of DA Krasner’s rights to equal protection under the Pennsylvania Constitution and a violation of the rights of Philadelphia voters who would effectively have their vote nullified by Act 40.

The amicus brief asks the court to declare Act 40 unconstitutional.

Attorney(s):
Stephen Loney, Marian Schneider, and Kate Steiker-Ginzberg of the ACLU of Pennsylvania; Mimi M. McKenzie and Claudia De Palma of the Public Interest Law Center
Pro Bono Firm:
John A. Freedman, Jonathan L. Stern, Jeremy Karpatkin, and Steven Hess of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP