Media Contact

ACLU-PA, media@aclupa.org

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania voters expressed their values and priorities at the polls today by voting to retain all three state Supreme Court justices on the ballot. The current Pennsylvania Supreme Court, including the justices retained, has a longstanding history of championing civil liberties. This decision reflects the public's desire to maintain a court that functions with the integrity and fairness needed to protect our individual rights and freedoms, particularly access to essential abortion care, which played a pivotal role in motivating voters in this race.

“Today’s decision underscores the vital role of our state courts and state constitution in safeguarding our commonwealth, particularly in instances where federal actions propagate harm to our communities," remarked Mike Lee, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania. "It also reinforces the power we hold when we actively engage in our system of checks and balances. This 'Yes' to retention is a declaration from Pennsylvanians who believe in our judicial system and trust the justices presiding over our state's highest court to continue acting with allegiance to our state and U.S. constitutions and our well-being."

This outcome follows a $914,000 voter education program paid for by the National ACLU to raise awareness about state Supreme Court retention elections, particularly about the impact on abortion rights and the far-reaching impacts we all can have when we vote and participate in our democracy.

Related Content

Resource
Placeholder image

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Retention Race 2025

On November 4, three state Supreme Court justices are up for retention. These retention elections appear as a YES or NO question at the end of your ballot.
Court Case
June 12, 2024
Judge gavel
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Warren, et al. v. Commonwealth, et al.

On June 13, 2024, the ACLU-PA filed a lawsuit against Governor Josh Shapiro and the leadership of the state General Assembly challenging the inadequate representation provided to indigent criminal defendants in Pennsylvania courts. As a result of decades of inadequate funding and oversight of its public defense system, indigent Pennsylvanians are at risk of being denied their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel in their criminal cases. The lawsuit was brought by 17 indigent Pennsylvanians facing criminal prosecution without effective assistance of counsel at each stage of their criminal proceedings. They brought the lawsuit on behalf of a class of all indigent Pennsylvanians at similar risk of harm due to the Commonwealth’s systemic failure to fund and supervise indigent defense services. The lawsuit asks a Pennsylvania court to rule that the current state of public defense services in Pennsylvania violates the constitution, so that the governor and the General Assembly will protect our constitutional rights by adequately funding public defense in Pennsylvania.
Court Case
November 7, 2022
  • Voting Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Pennsylvania State Conference of the NAACP et al. v. Schmidt et al

The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Pennsylvania have filed a federal lawsuit to ensure that Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that are missing a handwritten date on the return envelope or dated incorrectly are counted.
Podcast
Aug 14, 2020
Placeholder image
  • TLGBQIA+ Equality

"A liberating moment": TLGBQIA+ discrimination and the Supreme Court